Population aging and government transfer dependency in Tripp County as of 2022

Population aging and government transfer dependency in Tripp County as of 2022
John Lettieri, President and CEO of Economic Innovation Group — Official Website
0Comments

In 2022, Tripp County received $75.8 million in government transfer payments, equivalent to $13,620 per capita.

These payments—which include Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and income maintenance—accounted for 20.7% of all personal income in the county, according to information from the Economic Innovation Group.

This marks a slight increase in the county’s reliance on government transfers compared to 2012, when such payments made up 19% of total income. Since then, the share has risen by 1.7%.

Government transfer payments are non-repayable funds provided by federal, state, or local governments to support individuals in need. These payments aim to stabilize economic conditions and provide financial support during hardships. Key programs include Social Security transfers (retirement benefits), Medicare transfers (healthcare for seniors), Medicaid transfers (healthcare for low-income individuals), and income maintenance transfers (financial assistance for basic needs).

In 2022, government transfers in Tripp County primarily focused on older adults—such as Social Security transfers, which totaled $22.1 million (29.1% of all transfer income), and Medicare, which accounted for $16.7 million (22%)—played a significant role in the county’s overall income.

On a per capita basis, Social Security payments rose from $3,535 in 2012 and $919 in 1970 to $3,964 in 2022, reflecting a 12.1% increase over the past decade and a 331.3% shift since 1970.

Similarly, Medicare transfers climbed from $2,519 in 2012 and $179 in 1970 to $2,999, marking 19.1% and 1,575.4% increases, respectively.

These increases in per capita payments align with shifts in the county’s age distribution. In 2022, residents aged 65 and older made up 24.1% of the total population, compared to 22% in 2012 and 11.4% in 1970. While the senior share of the population has increased, the rise in per capita Social Security and Medicare transfers suggests that these assistance programs for older adults now require a larger share of government funding—either due to growing needs, expanded eligibility, higher benefit levels, or increased enrollment.

According to the Economic Innovation Group, total income in Tripp County excluding public assistance amounted to $52,102 per capita in 2022, compared to $65,722 when government transfers were included.

Breaking down the other contributions in the county, Medicaid transfers made up $17.3 million, a 22.8% share of total income, while income maintenance programs, including assistance such as SNAP or TANF, added another $10.6 million, or 14% of the total.

Compared to the previous year, Tripp County’s reliance on government transfers decreased by 2.6%.

Government transfers have long been a modest financial safety net, historically comprising only a small fraction of Americans’ income. However, since the 1970s—sometimes dubbed the “Great Transfer-mation”—dependency has surged from 8.2% (or $2,016 per capita in inflation-adjusted 2022 dollars) in 1970 to 17.6% (or $11,529 per capita) in 2022 nationwide.

According to the Economic Innovation Group’s analysis, these trends are not merely short-term responses to economic pressures but rather reflect a profound, long-term transformation in how government support is integrated into American life. The study illustrates that structural shifts—from rising healthcare expenses and demographic changes to stagnant wages—have significantly increased dependency on government transfers.

Breakdown of Government Transfers by Program in Tripp County, 2022
2022 South Dakota County Rankings by Per Capita Government Transfers
County State Rank (Per Capita Transfers) Dependency on Transfers (%) % Population 65+ Social Security Transfers (%) Medicare Transfers (%) Medicaid Transfers (%) Income Maintenance Transfers (%) Per Capita Transfers ($)
Fall River County 1 34% 30.92% 31.6% 21.9% 9.8% 8.5% $18,578
Spink County 2 20.79% 24.39% 24% 21.1% 40.9% 6.9% $18,057
Jerauld County 3 24.67% 29.9% 34.7% 40.9% 7.4% 8.6% $18,017
Oglala Lakota County 4 45% 7.61% 9.2% 11.1% 36.1% 31.8% $16,063
Todd County 5 42.36% 7.9% 10.8% 12.8% 32.8% 31.6% $15,184
Dewey County 6 27.79% 10% 15.8% 16.1% 26.5% 28.4% $15,130
Buffalo County 7 42.77% 9.92% 13.1% 11.7% 31.9% 32.3% $15,128
Day County 8 20.56% 26.87% 32.9% 30.9% 11.1% 10.5% $14,712
Custer County 9 23.2% 33.32% 40.8% 25.7% 6.1% 6.9% $14,538
Mellette County 10 31.9% 16.12% 18.7% 16.4% 26.7% 25.5% $14,481
Gregory County 11 23.41% 26.18% 31.9% 28.7% 12.5% 13.6% $14,244
Walworth County 12 22.63% 24.37% 34.7% 25.4% 14.9% 12% $14,174
Bennett County 13 28.73% 14.28% 16.8% 15.8% 29.2% 26% $13,953
Jackson County 14 31.49% 13.42% 17.8% 19.5% 24.1% 24.9% $13,928
Faulk County 15 15.4% 24% 30.4% 41.3% 9.7% 8.5% $13,640
Tripp County 16 20.72% 24% 29.1% 22% 22.8% 14% $13,620
Douglas County 17 17.81% 24.29% 33.5% 32.5% 13.2% 10% $13,152
Hanson County 18 16.64% 16.24% 50.5% 31.1% 2.1% 7.1% $13,071
Hyde County 19 16.31% 25.69% 34.7% 30.3% 13.7% 10.7% $13,052
Perkins County 20 24% 26.49% 34.1% 28% 12.9% 10.9% $13,042
Potter County 21 15.41% 27.47% 35.9% 36.6% 10.4% 7.2% $13,023
Pennington County 22 18.83% 20% 37.3% 24.2% 10.7% 10.3% $13,016
Corson County 23 30.84% 13.31% 15.9% 13.8% 26.7% 31.4% $12,764
Haakon County 24 16.35% 26.77% 33.7% 35.5% 8.1% 9.5% $12,759
McPherson County 25 17.59% 30.3% 36.3% 33% 9.7% 11.4% $12,757
Charles Mix County 26 23.47% 18.75% 25.1% 25% 19.7% 18.3% $12,675
Miner County 27 17.2% 23.41% 36.1% 31.1% 14.2% 10% $12,487
Lawrence County 28 18.19% 24.24% 40.1% 25.4% 8.4% 8.9% $12,355
Grant County 29 17.35% 24.17% 38.6% 29.1% 10.6% 8.4% $12,264
Kingsbury County 30 16.54% 22.96% 38.9% 32.7% 7.7% 9% $12,245
Roberts County 31 23% 20.87% 31.7% 20.3% 17.1% 16.8% $12,054
Campbell County 32 14.54% 31.66% 38.3% 34% 4.6% 9.9% $11,838
Butte County 33 24.44% 20.51% 34.4% 24.1% 11.6% 13.3% $11,679
Hutchinson County 34 15.9% 21.49% 37.7% 27.8% 12.9% 9.9% $11,636
Lyman County 35 19.91% 18.43% 28.6% 17.1% 21.2% 20.2% $11,518
Stanley County 36 13.85% 22.8% 44.9% 26.8% 4.2% 8.5% $11,371
Jones County 37 14.3% 27% 42.1% 23.5% 6.4% 14.1% $11,344
Ziebach County 38 33.48% 11% 10.3% 10.4% 26.8% 41% $11,283
Davison County 39 18.1% 20.61% 35.3% 25% 14.9% 11.9% $11,263
Marshall County 40 15% 23% 38.8% 29.3% 10.4% 10.5% $11,217
Sanborn County 41 17.26% 21.85% 34.4% 29% 7.7% 12.1% $11,042
Lake County 42 14.99% 24.88% 39.3% 26.9% 11% 10.2% $10,999
Yankton County 43 16.14% 21.57% 38% 24.9% 15% 10.9% $10,995
Deuel County 44 16.62% 22.17% 40.1% 29.8% 8.1% 9.7% $10,917
Hand County 45 12.67% 25.29% 39.5% 32.2% 9.4% 9.7% $10,857
Aurora County 46 18.2% 21.25% 33.3% 30.3% 8% 12% $10,730
Brule County 47 16.51% 20.6% 30.8% 20% 23.5% 13% $10,627
McCook County 48 14.48% 18.48% 37.2% 26.1% 16.6% 10.1% $10,622
Beadle County 49 18% 17.5% 32.6% 25.4% 18.4% 15% $10,542
Bon Homme County 50 19.23% 21.39% 36.9% 29.1% 9.7% 10.9% $10,466
Hughes County 51 16.3% 18.62% 36.4% 26.4% 13.7% 11.2% $10,433
Codington County 52 15.39% 19.63% 37.5% 27.2% 11.1% 11% $10,402
Turner County 53 14.54% 19.88% 37.6% 28.1% 12.1% 9.8% $10,318
Edmunds County 54 11.11% 23.21% 37.4% 30.1% 11.9% 9.7% $10,258
Brown County 55 14.19% 18.21% 37.5% 27.1% 12.1% 11.1% $10,173
Clark County 56 12.92% 23.63% 38.5% 24.1% 8.9% 12.5% $9,922
Moody County 57 14.88% 19.99% 40.4% 27.1% 7.1% 11.8% $9,890
Meade County 58 18.51% 17% 36.8% 21.9% 7.7% 11.2% $9,884
Minnehaha County 59 13.21% 13.79% 38.6% 24.2% 13.8% 12% $9,501
Hamlin County 60 14.48% 14.44% 35.7% 24.8% 12.4% 12.3% $9,225
Sully County 61 8.89% 27% 53.2% 28.9% 1.5% 8.3% $9,050
Union County 62 7.43% 19.22% 45.9% 27.4% 6.2% 7.5% $9,048
Clay County 63 16.95% 12.61% 32.7% 19.7% 16% 15.3% $8,230
Harding County 64 15.1% 21.73% 41% 23.4% 2.9% 14.2% $7,762
Brookings County 65 13.24% 13.72% 38.9% 22.3% 10.1% 12.4% $7,422
Lincoln County 66 7.22% 14.72% 45.4% 28.6% 3.9% 8.1% $6,016


Related

Senator Mike Rounds addresses loss, beef labeling transparency, and legislative outreach in recent posts

Senator Mike Rounds addresses loss, beef labeling transparency, and legislative outreach in recent posts

Senator Mike Rounds posted tributes and policy commentary between August 28-30, 2025.

2022: Correlation between aging and increasing government transfer dependency in Todd County?

2022: Correlation between aging and increasing government transfer dependency in Todd County?

Since 1970, Todd County’s population aged over 65 has increased by 1.7%, while income from age-related government transfers has fallen by 2.8%.

2022: Sully County aging and government transfer dependency trends

2022: Sully County aging and government transfer dependency trends

Since 1970, Sully County’s population aged over 65 has increased by 16.2%, while income from age-related government transfers has risen by 4.7%.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Central South Dakota News.